NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Science Exploration Chapter 1: Entering the World of Secondary Science
Very Short Answer Type Questions (1 Mark)
Short Answer Type Questions (2–3 Marks)
- Keep: Mass of the ball, speed and direction in which it has been hit.
- Ignore (in a simple model): Brand of the bat, colour of the ball, amount of grass on the field, air resistance, spin of the ball and stitching of the threads at the seam.
As the model becomes more complex, these ignored details can be added for greater accuracy.
- Law: Describes a regular pattern in nature using words or mathematical relationships. Example: Newton’s laws of motion.
- Theory: Explains why those patterns occur, based on evidence gathered over time. Example: Atomic theory explains how molecules are formed.
- Principle: A broad idea that helps make sense of a given situation. Example: Principle of conservation of energy applied while climbing stairs.
- What was the condition of the sky when it rained the last time?
- What is the humidity today?
- Was humidity above 80 per cent the last time it rained?
- What is today’s wind speed and direction?
- Is the temperature dropping the way it did before the recent rains?
These questions go beyond merely saying “clouds look dark”.
- First understand the situation being studied.
- Then identify the quantities that matter.
- Finally, make a rough estimate to check whether an answer makes sense.
Exact values are not always necessary, especially in the early stages of reasoning. An approximate estimate is often enough to tell whether a result is reasonable or impossible.
- ‘c‘ for speed of light comes from the Latin word celeritas (speed).
- m, v, F, I represent mass, velocity, force and electric current respectively, each associated with a defined unit.
- Physics: Particle motion and electrostatic attraction.
- Chemistry: Properties of polymer fibres.
- Biology: Size and behaviour of viruses.
- Mathematics: Modelling airflow and filtration efficiency.
This shows that real-world problems cannot be solved by a single branch of science alone.
Long Answer Type Questions (5 Marks)
Examples of models from different branches of science:
- Physics: A moving car may be represented as a single point. All its complex parts, shape, and structure are ignored because they are irrelevant when studying its motion.
- Chemistry: Atoms and molecules are drawn as spheres and bonds. This ignores the internal structure of atoms but helps in understanding how substances combine and react.
- Biology: Cells are shown as diagrams highlighting key parts. When studying how the heart pumps blood, many individual cells are ignored so that the organ can be understood as a functioning system.
- Earth Science: The Earth is treated as a smooth sphere layered into distinct regions. This simplification is useful when studying large-scale planetary behaviour.
Why ignoring details is a strength:
Building a model involves making assumptions and deliberately ignoring certain details. For example, when studying the motion of a falling object, air resistance may be neglected to understand the basic effect of gravity. These choices are not mistakes – they are done on purpose to keep things simple enough, yet still allow us to find answers to what we are looking for. As models are developed further, more details can be added for greater accuracy. Therefore, simplification in models is a purposeful tool of science, not a flaw.
About Meghnad Saha:
Meghnad Saha was an Indian physicist who studied the light emitted by stars. His work is featured in Chapter 1 as a powerful example of how scientific simplification leads to significant discoveries.
His Approach:
Science often begins by ignoring details. When Meghnad Saha studied light from stars, he did not try to model every atom, every reaction or every movement inside a star. Instead, he treated the matter in the star as a hot gas. He ignored many complex processes and focused only on temperature, pressure and how atoms formed ions.
His Discovery:
This simplification allowed him to explain how the colour of a star is deeply connected to its temperature. Stars that appear blue are hotter; stars that appear red are cooler.
What his approach teaches us:
- Simplification is not a shortcut — it is a deliberate and powerful scientific tool.
- By reducing a complex system to its most essential features, scientists can uncover relationships that would otherwise be hidden.
- As confidence in the model grows, more details can be added step by step.
- Science does not require complete information to begin – it requires the wisdom to know what to focus on.
1. Law:
- A law describes a regular pattern observed in nature.
- It is often expressed using words or mathematical relationships.
- Example: Newton’s laws of motion – they explain the jerk felt when a bus stops suddenly.
2. Theory:
- A theory goes a step further and provides an explanation of why those patterns occur.
- It is usually based on evidence gathered and tested over time.
- Example: The atomic theory explains how molecules are formed.
3. Principle:
- Principles are broad ideas that help us make sense in a given situation.
- Example: The principle of conservation of energy – applied, for instance, when climbing up stairs.
Is a scientific theory just a guess?
No. A scientific theory is not a guess or an untested idea. It is:
- An explanation based on careful testing and critical examination.
- Always open to improvement and revision when new evidence becomes available.
- Subject to change if new evidence demands it – but only based on evidence, never on opinion or belief.
This openness to being corrected is a key feature of science that makes it reliable. No scientific theory is ever final, and none is beyond question – and that is precisely its greatest strength.
Mathematics as a language, not a hurdle:
- Mathematics in science is not meant to be a hurdle or obstacle.
- It is a language that helps us think more clearly about the world.
- Learning to use mathematics in science does not mean memorising equations.
An equation is more than a calculation tool:
- An equation is a compact statement about how certain things are related.
- Example: Describing motion using quantities like distance, time, and velocity allows us to answer questions about where an object will be at a later moment.
- Similarly, mathematical expressions are used to describe rates of chemical reactions, patterns of population growth, and changes in energy within a system.
Mathematics as a tool for thinking:
- Mathematics becomes a powerful language for thinking, not just for finding numerical answers.
- If a student focuses on understanding the situation and the quantities involved, equations will begin to feel less like obstacles and more like helpful guides in their exploration of science.
What are scientific predictions?
- When laws, theories and models are well established, they allow us to anticipate what will happen under new or different conditions.
- These predictions can be made before performing an experiment – and in many cases even when an experiment cannot be performed at all.
- Predictions are not guesses – they are reasoned expectations based on evidence and careful thinking.
Examples from the chapter:
- Using ideas about motion, we can predict how far a kicked football will travel.
- Using knowledge of chemical reactions, we can predict how much carbon dioxide will be produced; how soft a baked bread will be.
- Using biological principles, we can predict how one’s breathing will change while running.
When predictions succeed: When predictions match observations, confidence in the underlying science grows.
When predictions fail:
- Scientists do not reject ideas based on opinion or belief – only on evidence.
- When predictions do not match observations, scientists re-examine their assumptions, models, or measurements.
- Even the most successful scientific theories have limits and may fail when new conditions are explored or when measurements become more precise.
- Such failures are not a weakness of science – they are its greatest strength.
- No scientific theory is ever final and none is beyond question.
Conclusion: Prediction is a powerful tool that drives further exploration and a deeper understanding of the world, regardless of whether the prediction succeeds or fails.
Example 1.3 – Estimating litres of air breathed in one day:
- Step 1: Estimate number of breaths per minute – At rest, a person takes about 12–15 breaths per minute. Approximate value used: about 15 breaths per minute.
- Step 2: Calculate total breaths per day – There are 60 × 24 = 1,440 minutes in a day. Total breaths ≈ 18,000 – 22,000, roughly 20,000 breaths per day.
- Step 3: Estimate volume of one breath – It takes about 4–5 breaths to fill a typical rubber party balloon. When inflated, a balloon holds about 2 litres. Therefore, one breath ≈ 0.5 litre.
- Step 4: Calculate total volume – 20,000 breaths × 0.5 litre = 10,000 litres per day.
Cross-checking with balloon example: A person could fill about 3 balloons per minute. 3 × 2 litres × 1,440 minutes = 8,640 litres — reasonably close to 10,000 litres, confirming our estimate.
Why science values careful reasoning over accurate calculations:
- Exact values are not always necessary, especially in the early stages of reasoning.
- An approximate estimate is enough to tell us whether a result is reasonable or impossible.
- Learning to estimate helps build intuition, detect errors and develop confidence in thinking.
- The aim is not to find the exact number, but to check whether the answer makes sense.
- As the chapter states – “Science values careful reasoning perhaps much more than accurate calculations.”
The Incident:
- A passenger aircraft ran out of fuel mid-flight due to a mix-up in units.
- The flight needed 22,300 kg of fuel in total.
- However, the ground crew used the wrong unit – they calculated the fuel using pounds (lb) per litre as the density, instead of kilograms (kg) per litre.
- As a result, the aircraft was loaded with far less fuel than required.
- The aircraft was about 15,000 litres short of fuel.
- Luckily, the aircraft could glide to an emergency landing. The aircraft was damaged, but there were no casualties.
Why this happened: Pounds and kilograms are very different units of mass. Using the wrong unit led to a serious miscalculation that could have been fatal.
Lessons from the incident:
- Standard (SI) units are critical – they ensure that measurements mean the same thing to everyone, everywhere.
- Unit mix-ups can have serious real-world consequences – not just in science, but in aviation, medicine, engineering, and daily trade.
- Using SI units everywhere avoids conversions and errors.
- This also connects to everyday life – when we buy a kilogram of rice or vegetables, we expect it to mean the same amount everywhere, based on agreed international standards, not local objects or opinions.
Science as a human activity:
Science is a human activity shaped by:
- Curiosity – asking questions about the world.
- Creativity – imagining new explanations and models.
- Collaboration – working with others, sharing results.
- Careful questioning – testing ideas rigorously before accepting them.
How science grows:
Science grows as people ask questions, test ideas, share results, and learn from mistakes. Science develops over time through the work of many individuals across different cultures and generations. It is not the product of a single person or country.
The self-correcting nature of science:
- No scientific theory is ever final and none is beyond question.
- When predictions do not match observations, scientists re-examine assumptions, models, and measurements.
- This openness to being corrected by nature itself is what has allowed science to help us understand the world.
Why scientific thinking matters beyond the classroom:
Even if a student does not choose to study science beyond Grade 10, scientific thinking will be very important in whatever they do. It helps understand the technology that surrounds us, evaluate information critically, and make sense of the world we live in. Science invites students not only to learn about the world, but also to learn ‘how’ we are trying to understand it.
The Viral Claim: “Food should not be eaten during an eclipse because it becomes harmful”. This claim circulates widely on social media.
The Scientific Approach – asking simple questions:
Rather than accepting or rejecting the claim based on belief, Chapter 1 shows how to disprove it using simple scientific questions:
- What physical change occurs during an eclipse? An eclipse is simply a play of shadows – the Moon comes between the Earth and the Sun, blocking sunlight temporarily.
- Does temperature change significantly during an eclipse? No significant change in temperature occurs.
- Does food go bad if it is left in a shadow? No – shadows do not cause any chemical or biological change in food.
Conclusion: No physical, chemical or biological mechanism supports the claim that food becomes harmful during an eclipse. Disproof comes simply from asking logical scientific questions.
Broader lesson: This example teaches students that scientific thinking is useful far beyond the classroom. It equips us to critically evaluate information we encounter in daily life, including on social media. Rather than accepting claims based on tradition or opinion, we should ask: What evidence supports this? What measurable, testable mechanism would explain it?